Backlash to Marie Gluesenkamp Perez high speed rail boondoggle
Vulnerable Democrat Marie Gluesenkamp Perez earned a brutal article in Clark County Today for backing a high speed rail boondoggle instead of local transportation needs.
Her “priorities seem out of step with the day to day needs of the people,” the piece said.
“What do tolls on the I-5 bridge, light rail importing crime and diverting road funding to a high speed rail boondoggle have in common? All are examples of Marie Gluesenkamp Perez ignoring local priorities to advance her extreme, out-of-touch agenda.” – NRCC Spokesperson Ben Petersen
In case you missed it…
Congresswoman Perez pushes high speed rail while other priorities remain unfunded
Clark County Today
John Ley
August 16, 2023
The $200 million could meet many local transportation needs
Congresswoman Marie Gluesenkamp Perez has written a letter to DOT Secretary Pete Buttigieg with nine other members of the Washington Congressional delegation seeking $198.1 million for the Cascadia High Speed Rail project planning. This comes at a time where Southwest Washington citizens are being asked to pay tolls to cover the underfunded portion of the $7.5 billion Interstate Bridge Replacement (IBR) project.
The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) submitted a Federal-State Partnership application to the Federal Railroad Administration in April 2023 to advance this project. During the 2022 legislative session, members of the Washington State Legislature allocated $4 million for additional analysis and development for future high-speed rail. They also allocated $150 million to be used as matching funds to leverage federal funding opportunities over the next six years.
Overall, the states hope to get a high speed rail line that would travel between Vancouver, B.C. and Portland, and possibly to Eugene. It would possibly travel at 250 miles per hour. It is unknown if there would be a stop in Vancouver, WA or if Clark County residents would have to go into Portland to catch the train.
[…]
The Cascadia High Speed Rail funding request occurs as the California High Speed Rail project has yet to lay a single track. Costs have exploded from under $40 billion to $105 billion as of a year ago. Estimates go as high as $128 billion. National Review recently labeled high speed rail “a Fast Train to Fiscal Ruin, in California and Elsewhere”.
[…]
Citizens remain concerned about the potential for $30 daily tolls to pay for portions of unfunded or under-funded transportation projects in the Portland metro area. ODOT has roughly a $3 billion shortfall, and the 75,000 Clark County residents who commute to work in Oregon fear tolling and vehicle mileage charges will harm them the most.
Portland has the 12th worst traffic congestion in the nation. Funding congestion relief projects is a top priority for citizens who experienced 72 hours of delays last year stuck in traffic.
The Reason Foundation’s Annual Highway Report ranks Washington state’s highways 46th out of the fifty states. The WPC reported “WSDOT Secretary Roger Millar has gone so far as to say “the system is on a glide-path to failure.” WSDOT has estimated that an additional $350 million per year is needed to bring the state highway system up to a state of good repair, but they have no plan to accomplish that. It would seem Millar would welcome the $200 million for road repairs.
Local cities have significant funding needs for transportation projects as well. The Camas Slough Bridge is a significant safety issue as the site of multiple accidents. Camas indicates it needs $45 million to replace the bridge.
The city of Battle Ground lists over $42 million in transportation projects on their 6-year transportation plan. Clark County lists over 20 projects totaling $238 million in project costs in their Transportation Improvement Plan.
Presumably a high speed rail line would need its own bridge over the Columbia River. That would be competing for funds to build a third and fourth vehicle bridges and transportation corridors over the Columbia. The RTC in their 2008 “Visioning Study” identified the need for two new bridges and transportation corridors over the river to handle expected population and traffic growth.
The congressional members’ priorities seem out of step with the day to day needs of the people for safe, uncongested roads and bridges.