Economy Alarm: Obama Administration Calls National Energy Tax a Job Killer

August 5, 2009

Obama Administration Calls National Energy Tax a Job Killer
Spin Coming from White House and Capitol Hill Runs Face First into EPA Study

Top Democrat Promised New Jobs, Deflected Cap and Trade Criticism as ‘False Choice’:

“[Rep] Waxman argued that pitting economic growth against clean energy ‘is a false choice’ used by Republicans to scuttle climate legislation. The redirection of the nation’s energy policies ‘will revitalize our economy,’ create clean energy jobs, reduce U.S. dependency on foreign oil and address climate change, he maintained.” (Associated Press, “Democratic Support for Climate Bill Broadens,” 05/18/2009)

Credibility Crash: Obama Administration Says National Energy Tax Will Kill Jobs, Weaken Economy:

Despite President Obama’s prediction that it would create new jobs, the climate change bill passed by the House will mean fewer jobs by 2030 than if Congress did nothing at all, according to the first comprehensive study of the measure by the federal government.

The report by the Energy Department’s Energy Information Administration said the bill would lead to small increases in electricity costs for consumers — what Democrats said was an affordable sacrifice for the environmental benefits of lowering greenhouse gas emissions.

“We can move to a clean energy future at a cost of less than a postage stamp per family per day,” Energy Secretary Steven Chu said.

The report said the average cost to a household by 2020 would be $114, though those costs would more than double to $288 by 2030 as the rules on polluters tighten.

The Democrat-controlled House narrowly passed its climate change bill on a 219-212 vote June 26. A week later, Mr. Obama told chief executives that the legislation “holds the promise of millions of new jobs — jobs, by the way, that can’t be outsourced.”
Mr. Chu repeated the assertion Tuesday.

But a chart in the EIA report showed the employment rate — just like the economy as a whole — worsening for the first several years, improving slightly in the midterm, peaking in 2024 and then declining steadily. It showed 0.25 percent fewer jobs in 2030 under the Democrats’ bill, with the manufacturing sector suffering a 2.5 percent lag.

For the economy as a whole, immediate energy price spikes would be followed by relative calm as the economy adjusted. But when stricter rules go into effect in 2025 “the rapid increase in energy prices causes the economy to contract,” EIA said. (Stephen Dinan, “Government Study: Climate Bill Spells Gloom for Jobs,” Washington times, 8/5/09)

To read the full article, click here: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/05/report-climate-bill-spells-gloom-for-jobs/

###