Retread Loser Janelle Stelson Brutally Called Out in Scathing Op-Ed
Retread loser Janelle Stelson’s high-cost energy agenda was brutally called out in a scathing op-ed. Stelson’s website features zero information on her energy agenda, but voters know she shamelessly supports the Biden-Harris Green New Deal policies that spiked energy prices in Pennsylvania and across the country.
“Retread loser Janelle Stelson’s Green New Deal energy policies would be an unmitigated disaster for hardworking Pennsylvanians. Voters know a vote for Stelson is a vote for high prices, gas lines, and total reliance on foreign energy.” – NRCC Spokesman Reilly Richardson
Read more from Real Clear Pennsylvania here or see excerpts below:
The Cost of Politics Is Showing Up on Your Electric Bill
Carl Marrara
Real Clear Pennsylvania
July 15, 2026
When families in Central Pennsylvania open their electric bills, they need an explanation for why electricity keeps getting more expensive. Come November, voters will surely have this issue top of mind.
A quick look on the Pennsylvania 10th Congressional candidate’s websites shows stark contrast. U.S. Rep. Scott Perry addresses this concern and acknowledges, “The Biden-Harris anti-American energy policies threaten our national security and have ruined our economy. America must be energy independent to grow our economy and maintain our security.” He correctly states he, “supports a blended energy portfolio that includes the development of clean energy technologies and using our vast energy resources – to reduce our dependence on foreign energy, turn around the economy, create jobs, reduce inflation, make energy more affordable, and preserve our environment.”
And on Janelle Stelson’s website? Nothing. Even with the find feature on and searching the word “energy,” it’s not mentioned once.
Janelle Stelson may not have released a detailed energy plan, but she has aligned herself with the broader Biden-era Democratic energy agenda on several social media posts. That matters because the policies that came out of the Biden-era White House, combined with policies pushed in Pennsylvania by Govs. Tom Wolf and Josh Shapiro, have made electricity more expensive for consumers. These policies have taken reliable baseload power offline, discouraged investment in new natural gas generation, and created uncertainty for the very projects Pennsylvania needs to keep the lights on and prices affordable.
The answer is pretty straightforward: energy markets run on supply and demand. When government policies make it harder to build and maintain reliable power generation, supply gets tighter. When supply gets tighter and demand keeps growing, prices go up. That is exactly what Pennsylvanians are feeling now.
Because new baseload energy production requires massive investments, the energy cost crunch can’t break or be fixed overnight. The Obama Clean Power Plan began the federal push to force coal-fired power plants and natural gas plants off the grid. Don’t take my word for it: In a 2008 interview President Obama admitted himself that, “my cap-and-trade program will cause electricity rates to necessarily skyrocket.” The Biden Administration charted a similar course with a new round of regulations aimed at coal and natural gas plants, including rules that would have required major emissions reductions from existing coal plants and new baseload gas plants. EPA has since described those Biden-era regulations as costly rules that raised costs and threatened grid reliability. Ms. Stelson said she supported these policies.
[…]
Pennsylvania energy leadership is also American energy leadership. Our Commonwealth is the nation’s largest electricity exporter and a major producer of natural gas and coal. We help power the grid, and our production is essential to American energy leadership, geopolitical stability, and national security. When government taxes something, regulates it into uncertainty, or makes it harder to build, we get less of it. That is simple economics.
That is why energy affordability should be a major issue in this congressional race. Voters deserve to know whether Janelle Stelson would support the same energy policies that have tightened electricity supply, discouraged natural gas investment, and increased costs for consumers. Pennsylvania does not need more Washington-based mandates that make reliable power more expensive. We need policies that encourage new generation, speed up permitting, protect baseload power, and recognize the environmental progress we continue to make.
Why has Janelle Stelson aligned herself with failed federal policies that have been proven to make energy more expensive? The choice is simple: Pennsylvania can build on what works, or face higher utility bills, steeper prices for everyday goods, and less reliable power.